Kipling's The Jungle Book has made Britain nation of 'passive racists' says John Barnes
#1
Posted 18 May 2012 - 06:41 PM
Former international footballer blames some of country's favourite writers for perpetuating 'negative images of black people'
Jamaican-born Barnes said racism exists because of ‘preconceived ideas’ that are planted through books and films that validate colonial prejudices
The 48-year-old called for children to be taught the non-existence of race as a concept on the National Curriculum
They have penned some of the nation’s best-loved books and are revered as greats of the literature world.
But authors such as Nobel Laureate Rudyard Kipling and Agatha Christie have been blamed for making Britain a country of ‘passive racists’ by portraying the white British imperialists as superior and native people as savages.
Former England star John Barnes said favourite tales, including Edgar Rice Burroughs's Tarzan of the Apes and Kipling's The Jungle Book, have instilled bigotry into the minds of generations.
His Christie comment was no doubt a reference to the title of her 1939 best-selling novel Ten Little Niggers - which caused such a furore that it was renamed a year later in the US as Ten Little Indians.
Modern versions of the book have been re-marketed as And Then There Were None.
And In Death On The Nile, her characters express a casual contempt for 'the natives' from their boat.
The ex-Liverpool winger launched a fierce attack on classic literature in a lecture to students at Liverpool University entitled ‘What is the cause of racism in football?’
Jamaican-born Barnes - who during the 1980s suffered serious racial abuse from the stands - said he wants to eradicate the latent prejudice that he sees makes white people tend to resist having black neighbours.
And he has called for a plan that would make teaching about the non-existence of race as a concept to be made central to the national curriculum.
The 48-year-old told the audience that racism exists because of ‘preconceived ideas’ that are planted through books like The Jungle Book and films that validate colonial prejudices.
He said: ‘Passive racism is inherent in all of us and the way we feel about a group of people is based on what we have been told for 200 years.
‘As a product of that, over the last 200 years we have had negative images of black people, which featured in literature by Rudyard Kipling to Agatha Christie.
‘Tarzan showed that.
‘Racism came from the idea of race, which is a man-made construct. Race is not scientific or genetic. It does not actually exist.
‘Race came about to validate and justify colonialism and slavery.’
Barnes moved to live in England at the age of 13 when his father was Jamaica’s military attaché to London in the late 1970s.
He is England’s most-capped black player but during his career at Liverpool FC Barnes regularly came under a torrent of racist abuse from the fans.
‘Passive racism might be seen in someone choosing to live next to a white person and that’s the racism we have to get rid of, added Mr Barnes.
‘If we get rid of passive racism then overcoming overt racism will take care of itself.
‘The majority of racism which goes on is unconscious - people do not even think about it. By letting people understand they are passive racists will help tackle it.’
Works by Kipling and Christie are not the only stories to cause a racism storm
One of Tintin’s classic adventures was banished to the adult shelves of bookshops because it was deemed overtly racist.
Fears that Tintin In The Congo, right, could have a negative effect on children led publishers to market it in protective packaging with warning labels similar to those on explicit magazines.
The Adventures Of Tintin was a series of comic books created by Belgian artist Georges Remi, who wrote under the pen name Herge.
Tintin In The Congo was written in 1930 and depicts African natives as ignorant, simple and backward people, who are far less intelligent than their white visitors.
Leading booksellers such as Waterstones have taken the book out of the children’s section, fearing it ‘could get into the wrong hands’.
But critics claim that selling the book like a soft porn magazine is politically correct censorship, especially when children are regularly allowed to see graphic violence and sexually explicit material in the media.
The book, which was not published in English until 2005, shows the black population bowing down to the boy reporter after he smashes a diamond smuggling racket involving Al Capone.
The black people are depicted as stupid with thick lips. They end up worshipping Tintin and his faithful dog Snowy like gods.
http://www.dailymail...rs-bigotry.html
Oh well, I think I'll go and read some Kipling to my kids.

It seems to me that God, with infinite wisdom and skill, is training the Anglo-Saxon race for an hour sure to come in the world's future. - Josiah Strong (1891)
Englisc Gateway Artwork | White Wyrm of England | White Wulf of England
#2
Posted 18 May 2012 - 06:57 PM
As far as books colouring (no pun intended) people's perceptions is concerned well let's follow that to its logical conclusion - ban the Koran, a religious text that advocates peadophillic practices which are illegal in this country. No? Then I'd advise Barnes to keep quiet and stick to talking about football.
In defeat, malice; in victory, revenge
En lied ús net yn fersiking
#3
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:02 PM
The majority of people of all races prefer to live amongst people with a similer identity and culture. When a foriegn people and alien culture are forceably imposed upon a communitty without being asked or regarded then animosity and hatred grows.
This is what racism is all about.
Most English couldnt give a damn about Africa and Africans or the Carabean and Carabeans until they have a non white community growing in their community. This is why we get whtite flight. This is why the majority of non whites live in their own rapidly expanding communities.
Britain is now a divided (diversity) country along lines of race and culture. One day there will be conflict and deaths on a massive scale. Well done Westminster, all you need now is a spark.
#4
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:04 PM
Isnt it about the killing off of a group of people one by one? I have not read it but it appears the idiot is making a comment on a book based purely on his perception....idiot. But I suppose facts dont figure in the anti white agenda of idiots like John Barnes.
#5
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:21 PM
#6
Posted 18 May 2012 - 07:29 PM
You call it freedom and tolerance. I call it a death dance for England
#7
Posted 18 May 2012 - 08:54 PM
#8
Posted 18 May 2012 - 10:35 PM
And to implement a systematic denial that a particular people even exist is just about the worst form of racism there is."-John Lovejoy
"Anyone who thinks multiculturalism will ever work is frankly a bit soft in the head." -Me
Holdscipe mec bintst.
#9
Posted 18 May 2012 - 11:36 PM
#10
Posted Yesterday, 08:16 AM
And to implement a systematic denial that a particular people even exist is just about the worst form of racism there is."-John Lovejoy
"Anyone who thinks multiculturalism will ever work is frankly a bit soft in the head." -Me
Holdscipe mec bintst.
#11
Posted Yesterday, 09:07 AM
Witnere, on 19 May 2012 - 08:16 AM, said:
Slavery?
#12
Posted Yesterday, 05:09 PM
As for race, yes it does exist, read somewhere that whites have 4% Neanderthal and blacks have none.....meaning we are different. Also we can start bringing up the old 'well what have blacks ever invented' argument, which brings up a big list of 0, right?
And if the stupid bastard doesn't want people thinking about race then maybe he should shut his fucking mouth?
Born on the Wansdyke. Proud Saxon!
#13
Posted Yesterday, 07:13 PM
Woden, on 18 May 2012 - 07:29 PM, said:
Agree 110%.
Edited by South Saxon, Yesterday, 07:17 PM.
#14
Posted Yesterday, 11:57 PM
1021 years have past and that man is still an inspiration to the heart and soul of the ENGLISH that know what it is to love and swear the oath to our birthright land, it's history, people and original culture.
It is said that it was a negative stigma for the families who's men survived the Battle of Maldon, Barnes your ethos marks you with that same stigma
As a side, while there today I heard a young boy tell his father, after reading the plaque, "we are not taught anything about this in school". How very sad !!
In another 100 years Barnsey will be forgotten.
E C
#15
Posted Today, 05:53 AM
#16
Posted Today, 08:52 AM
ÙS SYNDRIG
#17
Posted Today, 09:54 AM
#18
Posted Today, 10:16 AM
Thjodolfr, on 20 May 2012 - 05:53 AM, said:
His 'wisdom' is simply grievance-mongering, dressed up to look like something else. No doubt Barnes has been doing some reading since he retired from football and what better way to push the narrative, as a negro, than by saying 'race is a social construct'. Biology describes race as 'a distinct population within a species', and whether he likes it or not Barnes is from a subspecies and we another. Sociology is psuedo-science, it's half fact half fiction. The fiction half is a continually changing set of theories on the function of human society. Barnes is firmly on the fiction side which says fuck nature, man is a political animal so we can change him by altering the conditions of his existence. And they do.
Steve
PARLIAMENT IS THE ENEMY OF THE ENGLISC NATION
The English, insofar as they recognise their origin, identity and cultural roots, are not 'Westerners', but an ancient northern people - Rev. John Lovejoy
hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað
#19
Posted Today, 11:27 AM
"You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!"... - yep, the man was an out and out Nazi
#20
Posted Today, 12:05 PM
Searu man, on 20 May 2012 - 11:27 AM, said:
"You're a better man than I am, Gunga Din!"... - yep, the man was an out and out Nazi
And I seem to remember Mowgli was very much a hero! It seems that Barnes need to read these works, and remember that in the nineteenth century natives were portrayed as they were then not as 'they' are now. If Barnes has read these books, he clearly lacks sufficient intellect to understand. John Barnes is a roly-poly retired football player who is remembered for one goal scored against the Brazilian 'reserves' largely because none of them could be bothered to tackle him. Watch, is it really a great goal or piss poor defending? Not sure Garrincha, Pele, Rivelino and Zico really drooled "with envy"...
Also tagged with Racism, Kipling, Political Correctness
News Forums →
English News →
Self Defense Expert Banned From Entering EnglandStarted by southerner, 10 May 2012 |
|
|
||
News Forums →
English News →
Blacklist BannedStarted by southerner, 08 May 2012 |
|
|
||
Guestbook / Introductions / Announcements →
New Users →
Anti white councilStarted by OldEnglish, 29 Aug 2011 |
|
|
||
→
Essential Reading →
Racism - The factsStarted by Seaxan, 20 Jun 2009 |
|
|



