Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Anders Breivik: I did it for Norway.


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
26 replies to this topic

#1 Andy

Andy

    Honorary Member

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,151 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 05:02 PM

'I did it for Norway': Mass killer Breivik boasts of committing 'most spectacular attack on Europe since World War II' and tells court he would do it all again
  • Lay judge Thomas Indreboe dismissed from bench after online comments in aftermath of slaughter that said Breivik should face death penalty
  • Breivik read from prepared statement in Oslo court to explain his actions
  • Says: 'I would do it all again. I was motivated by goodness not evil'
  • 'These were not innocent, non-political children'
  • 'Inspired by Al Qaeda... the most successful militant group in the world'
  • Trial over events of July 22, 2011, expected to last 10 weeks
  • Killed 8 in Oslo bomb blast then gunned down 69 on Utoya island

Mass murderer Anders Behring Breivik today said he carried out his sickening killing spree 'for Norway' and boasted that, if he could, then he would do it all again.
Reading from a prepared statement, he said he was 'motivated by goodness not evil' and that his murder of 77 people was 'the most spectacular and sophisticated attack on Europe since World War II'.
He lashed out at Norwegian and European governments for embracing immigration and multiculturalism and said he killed 'to save future generations'.


Posted Image
Salute: For the second day in a row, killer Breivik clenched his his fist in front of him as he entered the Oslo courtroom

During his rambling one hour and 20 minute rant the 33-year-old was stopped on four occasions - three times by the senior judge Wenche Elisabeth Arntzen - and once by counsel for the families.
On each occasion it was suggested he had either overstepped his time frame for his address - or said things that were unnecessarily hurtful.

Wow, so there is a time limit on the mans reasons for his actions. He is providing reason for his actions as a defence of those actions, if he isnt allowed to speak freely then would this trial be valid?
In one particularly odious pronouncement he spoke of the Labour party’s youth wing group camping on the island of Utoya where he killed 69 youngsters.
He said: 'The majority of young people were brainwashed and naive, indoctrinated by schools or their parents.

I agree with what he is saying, I dont agree with attacking the brainwashed children though. If he had attacked those who do the brainwashing he would have made a better impact.
Posted Image
Dismissed: Lay judge Thomas Indreboe posted comments online saying Breivik should be executed

'They were not innocents but they actively upheld multi-cultural values. Many people had leading positions in the Labour Party youth wing and were on county boards.
'They were in many ways similar to Hitler Youth at an indoctrination camp.' In justifying his actions Breivik's prepared statement also saw him discuss everything from Hitler to 'Multiculturalism in Luton'.
He even found time to quote from surveys conducted in Britain about multiculturalism and to mention Enoch Powell’s infamous 1968 ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech - in which the late Tory politician warned of the perceived dangers of greater immigration from Commonwealth countries.

So again he is giving valid and factual statistics which show the deliberate destruction of the white nations. The difference is that there are those who care about their race and community and the authorities who dont give a damn.
Breivik began by describing himself as a member of the ‘Norwegian European Resistance Movement’ before hitting out at those who had described him as 'naive , mean, insane, psychotic, a necrophiliac - and a Narcissist who only wants attention'.
He then argued he was none of these but a 'Nationalist' responsible for the most ‘sophisticated and spectacular act’ since the Second World War.
Warming to his address he told of how Marxists and Liberals had brainwashed the young in Norway and Europe by infiltrating schools and colleges and how there was ‘now no democracy in Norway.’
Turning to Britain he spoke of a recent survey which suggested 69 per cent of the population within the UK sees the issue of immigrations as a ‘major or great problem.’
He added that another survey, he claimed came from the Times newspaper in February 2010, had reported that ‘three out of five English believe that the UK has become dysfunctional because of multiculturalism.’
He said the same views were held by man people in ‘Norway, Sweden, Germany and France.’

He then defended his actions on July 22 last year as he went on: 'I would have done it again because offences against my people - and many partisans - are in many ways just as bad.'
Breivik added that Europe had prevented any democracy since Hitler came to power before the Second World War.
As he read from his prepared statement he apologised at one point about the time being taken - but insisted he would continue to read from an address that he had already cut from 20 pages to 13 and added after 35 minutes: ‘There are five pages left.

'Breivik claimed he had been a ‘victim’ himself as he insisted it was vital he explain the reasons behind his actions as he added: 'I’m not scared at the prospect of being in a prison - I was born in a prison and I continued to live in a prison.'
After a further interruption from the senior judge Breivik said he must finish his address because it formed the 'basis of my whole defence.'
Drawing to a close he added: 'I was born and grew up in a conflict zone that is Oslo. The Labour Party bought flats in West Oslo and handed them out to Muslims.
'Muslims want autonomy under Sharia law in places like Luton, Paris and Marseille.'


Comparing himself to Red Indian chiefs such as Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse he then added: 'Were they terrorists because they fought for indigenous rights? No they were heroes and not terrorists.'

Breivik ended his statement by saying: 'The attacks on July 22 were a preventive strike.
'I acted in self-defence on behalf of my people, my city, my country. I therefore demand to be found innocent of the charges.'


Later under cross examination Breivik said that he gave himself a ‘mandate to protect the Norwegian people’ by his actions.
He added: 'I know what happened on July 22 was gruesome - but it was cruel and necessary. I was involved in a suicide attack - and I did not expect to survive the day.'


Later during cross-examination Breivik was asked what had made him ‘give up on democracy’ after initially becoming a young member of the Norwegian Progress Party
He told the court he had joined neo-Nazi gangs after reaching his late teens in the western district of Oslo where he lived at the time.

He said: 'I became involved in maybe 20 confrontations with Muslims in Norway. What affected me most was something that happened when I was 16 or 17-years-old.
'The Muslims came to our area and robbed people, they raped people and they did not have any consequences for their actions.
'Those who tried to organise themselves against them were called racists and Neo-Nazis straight away - and that was unfair.'
He also said he was inspired by the Al Qaeda terror network and said: 'We have attempted to introduce new traditions for militant nationalists in Europe and we have taken a bit from Al Qaeda and Islamists including the use of martyrdom.
'Al Qaeda is the most successful militant group in the world and I believe militant nationalists in Europe have a great deal to learn from them.
'The resistance movement since World War Two has been pathetic and we have to introduce these new traditions.'


Breivik's statement and much of his five day testimony is not being broadcast by any television media for fear he is using it as a platform to promote his extremist views.

The trial in an Oslo court house started yesterday when Breivik, in dark suit and gold tie, walked into court sporting a huge grin and oozing defiance.
Aware that the eyes of world's media were upon him, the far-Right extremist waited for police to remove his handcuffs before performing a closed-fist, Nazi-style salute for the cameras.
Breivik smirked at footage of his devastating bomb attack which claimed eight lives in the centre of Oslo last summer.
He was nonchalant as prosecutors listed graphic details of how 69 victims, mainly teenagers, died during his gun rampage on the island of Utoya that same day in July.
At one point during the first day of his ten-week trial he broke down and wept – but not for his innocent victims. His eyes welled up as a 12-minute video of his own deranged right-wing 'manifesto' was shown.

It is accompanied by an 1,800-page document in which he calls for an end to 'Muslim infiltration of Europe' and the multiculturalism he so despises.
The first 80 minutes of proceedings at Oslo District Court were taken up with naming those he killed on July 22 last year.
An impassive Breivik simply sat and stared at court paperwork before him.
There was no flicker of emotion from the 33-year-old self-confessed killer as details were given of the horrific injuries suffered by those who died after he planted a van bomb in the centre of the Norwegian capital.
The sickening list of pistol and gunshot wounds suffered by those on the island of Utoya, where he went after the bombing, left him similarly untroubled.
Such was the horror of the graphic descriptions of their injuries that Norwegian TV, broadcasting proceedings live to the nation, blanked out the details.


The court was shown pictures of Breivik wearing paramilitary uniforms and posing with the guns he would use to kill so many innocent victims.
At the start of the trial he conceded he was behind the bombing and shootings which left 77 dead but added: 'I admit to the acts – but not criminal guilt.'
He claimed he acted in self-defence to protect Norway from Muslims by attacking the left-leaning political party he blamed for the country's liberal immigration policies.


Rejecting the authority of the court, he called it a vehicle of the 'multiculturalist' political parties in power in Norway.

Breivik could face a maximum 21-year prison sentence or an alternate custody arrangement that would keep him locked up as long as he is considered a menace to society.

The dropout
Breivik was an Oslo teenager living with his mother when he dropped out of secondary school in 1997.
He began working for a telesales firm in its customer service department but several attempts to start business ventures failed.
Breivik finally made some money when he started a business called Diploma.com in 2002, selling false educational certificates, giving him enough money to move out of his mother's flat and bankroll his massacre.


The Knights Templar
He told police he was a resistance fighter in a far-right militant group modelled on the medieval Knights Templar, who fought during the Crusades.
Officers could not find any such organisation – despite Breivik claiming he even travelled to London for a meeting – and the prosecutor Svein Holden told the court: 'In our opinion, such a network does not exist.'
Between 2006 and 2007, Breivik became obsessed with the online role-playing game World of Warcraft.


The bomb factory
As Breivik became immersed in his 'crusade' to rid Norway of Muslims he began purchasing police uniforms and badges, guns and ammunition, and bomb ingredients.
He spent more than £25,000 on 11 credit cards. Last year he rented a farm 100 miles north of Oslo, where he registered himself as a business cultivating 'root and beet' items. This enabled him to order vast amounts of fertiliser to make his van bomb.


The Oslo blast
A week before the atrocity Breivik rented two vans from an Avis outlet in Oslo – a Volkswagen and a smaller Fiat Duplo. The VW was loaded with explosives and the Fiat was his transport to Utoya. On July 22 he posted his 'manifesto' on the internet using a computer in a small room at his mother's home.
The court was shown CCTV footage of Breivik parking the larger van, containing a 2,000lb bomb, outside the entrance to the offices of the prime minister and minister of justice at 3.17pm.
After lighting a fuse with a burn time of seven minutes he was seen walking away towards his getaway car.
In the moments before the explosion 32-year-old blast victim Jon Vegard Lervag was seen walking towards the back of the van. There were gasps in the court as the screen filled with a yellow fireball.
As the devastating blast and the death of the innocent passer-by shown was on screen, Breivik looked on impassively, merely raising his eyebrows as the bomb went off.


Roll call of death
Reciting the names of the Oslo and Utoya victims took court prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh more than 80 minutes. Among the eight who died in and around the government building was 61-year-old Hanne Marie Orvik Endresen.
She had been in the reception area and suffered sickening injuries to her intestine and abdomen. But it was the sheer detail of what happened when Breivik got to the island and began to kill the young Labour party supporters that will stick in the memory.
The youngest victim was 14-year-old Sharidyn Svebbak-Bohn who was shot in the lungs and chest by Breivik. She had been trying to shelter on an escarpment at the water's edge. Moments earlier she had heard the screams of 17-year-old Sondre Dale who was shot four times through the throat and chest.
In the café on the island 18-year-old Bendik Ellingsen was shot a total of eight times – with bullets also entering his head twice. Another café victim was Aleksander Eriksen,16, shot six times in the head.
One victim who thought he might escape Breivik was 16-year-old Andreas Gronnesby, but as he ran away he fell off a cliff near the island's West Point. He was found dead in the water with a fractured pelvis.
Hakon Odegaard, 17, also tried to swim from the island to escape Breivik's bullets. He was found drowned.


Read more: http://www.dailymail...l#ixzz1sJdFwehJ

rune31.gifrune3.gifrune21.gifrune29.gifrune18.gif : rune27.gifrune28.gifrune21.gifrune17.gifrune18.gif: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians and Europe for Europeans.


#2 KingSaeward

KingSaeward

    Huscarl

  • +Devoted Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 825 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:06 PM

The guy is a fruitloop, unfortunately the one thing he does seem to recognise is the state of affairs in Europe. Nice one Breivik, now noone can talk about migration without looking like a homocidal maniac.

StonehengeHeader.jpg


#3 Bane Of Dumnonia

Bane Of Dumnonia

    ....

  • ++Secured Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,360 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:20 PM

Doctors/psychiatrists have declared him fully sane KS. Do you know better?. If so, how exactly?. You can place restrictions on your own freedom of speech in order to conform to what 'others' may think, that is your choice. But 'others' are often wrong, and need to be told so in no uncertain terms.

1. Capitalists who want lower wage costs and less labour organisation.
2. The globalist elitists who seek a post-national, post-political population of compliant consumers, workers and debt slaves.
3. The internationalist political class, which is determined to govern over a de-sovereignised and disenfranchised people.
4. Anti-white neo-Marxists pursuing a post-racial utopia.
5. Ethnic activists, secular and religious.


http://majorityrights.com/
http://eyeofwoden.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/

 

 



 


#4 _Steed_

_Steed_
  • Guests

Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:21 PM

I've noticed several Nationalist bloggers beginning to warm to Breivik. I'd just like to, rhetorically, ask them whether they realise the following:

- Breivik is a Zionist.
- Breivik murdered 77 people. Yes they were ideological enemies, but ignorant and undeserving of slaughter.
- Breivik has harmed our cause more than he has helped it.

#5 Bane Of Dumnonia

Bane Of Dumnonia

    ....

  • ++Secured Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,360 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 06:32 PM

I believe it's widely known he was a Zionist. Many nationalists are, as Zionism in reality is nationalism perfected, and in practice. They also advocate a return to Israel of all Jews and in this regard I enthusiastically support them myself.

I don't think your second two points are accurate at all.

1. Capitalists who want lower wage costs and less labour organisation.
2. The globalist elitists who seek a post-national, post-political population of compliant consumers, workers and debt slaves.
3. The internationalist political class, which is determined to govern over a de-sovereignised and disenfranchised people.
4. Anti-white neo-Marxists pursuing a post-racial utopia.
5. Ethnic activists, secular and religious.


http://majorityrights.com/
http://eyeofwoden.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/

 

 



 


#6 Waiguurd

Waiguurd

    Huscarl

  • ++Secured Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,295 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:07 PM

In my opinion Anders Breivik is a fanatic and a mass murderer. With his cowardly attack he damaged the Anti-islamic-movement. He put himself on the same level as the Islamic terrorists. He's narcissistic and irresponsible against his folc he pretended to save future generations. He should have worked constructively against Islamisation and mass immigration
and not shooting children. He should have fought against the hate preachers and islamic fundamentalists and not against kids.
In my eyes he's a loser and coward. He didn't it for Norway or Europe, he did it for himself for his vanity and prestige.

#7 Steven

Steven

    Look and Learn

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,385 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:10 PM

Meticulous planning yielded maximum results from a one man operation. A government building seriously damaged with a car bomb was a distraction from the main attack on Utoya Island. However, it was also an attack on the political elite who collectively will render Norwegians a minority in their own homeland by 2050. The majority minority in 2050 will be Muhammadans and it is then that Norway will cease to exist as a Nordic nation. Sweden will follow a decade or two later. When it does you can expect a forging of these two countries into one Islamic state. Of course that is what our own political class have planned for us here in England; they can't deny it, the figures speak for themselves.

The UK's Muhammadan population is 3 million plus and the vast majority of those are in England. Breivik acted on what he saw as a racial and ethnic takeover of his homeland by those who worship multiculturalism - the same worshippers we have here in England. There is no difference between socialists in Norway and socialists elsewhere in Northern Europe. The game is mass immigration and for each, sometime, somewhere they agreed to do the same: no majority ethnic group = equality, the mantra of the Left. It won't work because one ethnic group will fight to gain dominance over the others and that is human nature. The future, as Enoch Powell knew, is blood and death on an unimaginable scale.

Steve

PARLIAMENT IS THE ENEMY OF THE ENGLISC NATION


Posted Image


The English, insofar as they recognise their origin, identity and cultural roots, are not 'Westerners', but an ancient northern people - Rev. John Lovejoy

hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre, mod sceal þe mare þe ure mægen lytlað


#8 _Steed_

_Steed_
  • Guests

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:30 PM

I don't think your second two points are accurate at all.


How about my 4th - that the whole thing was a false flag operation? ;)

#9 Bane Of Dumnonia

Bane Of Dumnonia

    ....

  • ++Secured Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,360 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 07:33 PM

Could well have been m8. Lots of doubts as to how he could have done all this acting alone.

(Google-Albert Pike, World Wars 1,2 and 3)

1. Capitalists who want lower wage costs and less labour organisation.
2. The globalist elitists who seek a post-national, post-political population of compliant consumers, workers and debt slaves.
3. The internationalist political class, which is determined to govern over a de-sovereignised and disenfranchised people.
4. Anti-white neo-Marxists pursuing a post-racial utopia.
5. Ethnic activists, secular and religious.


http://majorityrights.com/
http://eyeofwoden.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/

 

 



 


#10 _Steed_

_Steed_
  • Guests

Posted 17 April 2012 - 08:46 PM

Precisely. We know that the 'elite' are trying to foment a war between Islam and the West. Witnesses heard gun shots from two different locations on Utoya, and as a professional graphics guy I can tell you many of the photos of Breivik are fake.

#11 Bane Of Dumnonia

Bane Of Dumnonia

    ....

  • ++Secured Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,360 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:20 PM

I would suggest Mossad but I don't wanna get called a neo-nazi again!!!:)

1. Capitalists who want lower wage costs and less labour organisation.
2. The globalist elitists who seek a post-national, post-political population of compliant consumers, workers and debt slaves.
3. The internationalist political class, which is determined to govern over a de-sovereignised and disenfranchised people.
4. Anti-white neo-Marxists pursuing a post-racial utopia.
5. Ethnic activists, secular and religious.


http://majorityrights.com/
http://eyeofwoden.blogspot.co.uk/

http://www.westernspring.co.uk/

 

 



 


#12 _Steed_

_Steed_
  • Guests

Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:23 PM

F**k it! I say Mossad at every available opportunity. Posted Image

#13 KingSaeward

KingSaeward

    Huscarl

  • +Devoted Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 825 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:26 PM

Its true that some of the facts don't add up. When asked the police said that they had been watching him. Well, if they had been watching him then how comes he was able to buy a shed-load of fertilizer and purchase god knows how many assault-rifle rounds.

Either the police fucked up bad or they let him do it to discredit us all (perhaps not realising how successful he was going to be.)

StonehengeHeader.jpg


#14 Yngvi

Yngvi

    Englalond Eoder

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,707 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 09:31 PM

This whole thing has been created by the EUSSR.

Multiculturalism is Dr Frankenstein and no matter what they try to do to make it seem lovey dovey it will always create monsters - sadly Breivik was a well made monster and i'm more than definite there are more to come.

The worlds population are being sardine'd into a tin can of genocide all whilst a handful of out of touch millionaires grim reap the rewards. This case is no surprise to Dr Frankenstein and doesn't change a thing. Breivik will be banged up in an asylum for the rest of his days and nothing will change with the EUSSR steam train. Sadly its full steam ahead for them and if people are ploughed down along the way, so be it.
george borrow (1803-1881) - english writer
"Let no one sneer at the bruisers of England - What were the gladiators of Rome or the bull fighters of Spain, in its palmist days, compared to England's bruisers?".

Posted Image

#15 Guthlac

Guthlac

    King

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,056 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 11:16 PM

He did it for no one, he is nut whose watched to many Rambo films.

#16 Yngvi

Yngvi

    Englalond Eoder

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,707 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 11:26 PM

He did it for no one, he is nut whose watched to many Rambo films.


Very true Guthlac I agree totally, he was a nut driven by hate, but do you seriously believe he was crazy enough to do all of this without any kind of political input?

Its a fucked up world we live in, but with no thanks to the forced multicultural politics spreading like cancer and sadly Breivik is a well made creation of its damning power. There are extremists on all sides - left and right.

However, one question needs to be asked - If a man did this for England would he still be a nut or a martyr?
george borrow (1803-1881) - english writer
"Let no one sneer at the bruisers of England - What were the gladiators of Rome or the bull fighters of Spain, in its palmist days, compared to England's bruisers?".

Posted Image

#17 AelfredSeax

AelfredSeax

    Little Englander

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,874 posts

Posted 17 April 2012 - 11:41 PM

I think It's an act of desperation. These people are have discovered the truth of our planned genocide and it is too much for them. David Copeland reacted in much the same way back over 10 yrs ago. But you will get no where bombing shooting maming and killing innocent people. It does no good for getting people to see your point of view.

"And Now, at long last, our men of the world, our men of 1914, the grim ranks of our ex-servicemen again and again betrayed by our politicians. They join hands with the new youth, the new generation, which remembers the past - we say England is not dead ! We say, and I ask you to say with us, lift up your voices in this great meeting in the heart of England ! Send to all the world a message ! England lives - and marches on !
E.L.A.M.O
Sir Oswald Mosley, Manchester, 1931
 


#18 Waiguurd

Waiguurd

    Huscarl

  • ++Secured Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,295 posts

Posted 18 April 2012 - 12:03 AM

I would suggest Mossad but I don't wanna get called a neo-nazi again!!!Posted Image


Don't worry mate Posted Image

#19 Guthlac

Guthlac

    King

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,056 posts

Posted 18 April 2012 - 12:49 AM

However, one question needs to be asked - If a man did this for England would he still be a nut or a martyr?


He would still be a nut, and would not be doing it for England. There are no sane excuses to murder innocent people. Many of those victims did not belong in that country, but that was not their choice, they were taken there or born there. Repatriation yes, murder no. Plus a I don't care for martyrs, to much religious connotation. They are usually the gullible types, the self-deluded types, the perpetual paranoid victim types, the insane and those though killed who while alive never considered themselves to be nor wanted to be a martyr in the first place. I dont know, but I very much doubt Edmund the martyr ever consider himself one before his death. He was a warrior who was simply fighting an armed enemy military force.

#20 Yngvi

Yngvi

    Englalond Eoder

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,707 posts

Posted 18 April 2012 - 08:04 AM

The man is clearly a self-deluded nut job but his reason is reality - Norway and the rest of Europe are under threat of genocide by mass immigration. Do you agree?
I don't believe Breivik to be the last and he certainly wasn't the first to do something like this. Sadly as you say its always innocent victims who were merely following what they thought to be right.
george borrow (1803-1881) - english writer
"Let no one sneer at the bruisers of England - What were the gladiators of Rome or the bull fighters of Spain, in its palmist days, compared to England's bruisers?".

Posted Image