Jump to content


- - - - -

Liverpool and the Marxist BBC


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Steven

Steven

    Look and Learn

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,092 posts
  • Ethnicity:Englisc via West Saxon
  • Location:Dorsetshire
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 January 2012 - 12:32 PM

The Leaving of Liverpool ...and Truth - Biased BBC


There was a real BBC hatchet job carried over the holidays concerning Margaret Thatcher and her approach to Liverpool in the early '80's and B-BBC contributor Alan picks up on the detail;

"And aren’t we lucky that we are forced, under threat of imprisonment, to pay the salaries of those who lie to us so grievously? One man's suggestion to the Conservative government in 1981 has been spun as another example of a wicked Thatcherite policy imposed upon the downtrodden workers by the BBC.

'The trend for transforming other people’s struggles into self-serving morality plays has led to an alarmingly casual attitude towards the distinction between truth and lies....and a preference for simplistic moralism over the tough taskof reporting.'

'Thatcher told to abandon Liverpool' says BBC...not 'Thatcher spent hundreds of millions regenerating Liverpool'. Every BBC news broadcast stated that Lord Howe had urged Thatcher to abandon Liverpool to decline. There was no context, no explanation....if you listened to the BBC you would almost certainly believe that this was in fact Tory policy that they actually carried out.You might not realise in fact that Lord Heseltine spent 18 months transforming the situation and pumping millions of pounds into Liverpool.

In 1981 Sir Geoffrey Howe acknowledged the suggestion that the city could be left to a “managed decline” was potentially explosive.“This is not a term for use, even privately,” he warned Mrs Thatcher. “It is much too negative.”

The BBC knows such a charge is highly provocative and socially dangerous and feeds the stereotypical image of the Tories.....the BBC fully intend to stir up as much anti-Tory anger and hatred as possible to make them unelectable...and seem quite happy at the prospect of any possible riots....caused by Tory 'neglect'. Lord Heseltine rightly says..."The judgement should be about did we do the right thing?"

But the BBC aren't interested in that. Or the fact that Howe was merely suggesting that the limited amount of money available might be more wisely spent in other ares more deprived and more likely to benefit....if all the money went to Liverpool surely other towns and cities must be at least partially 'abandoned' then?

In an interview on 5Live Steven Nolan was talking to a community worker from Liverpool who stated Liverpool had been in decline not because of central government so much, but because of local politicians...Labour and Liberal ones...that the Tories did a lot to help. Nolan instead of asking in what way these politicians destroyed Liverpool's economy ignored this and rapidly moved on....to claim that we saw riots on the streets of Liverpool this summer caused by social deprivation as in 1981.......feeding into the BBC belief that the riots were all about social injustice and greedy bankers....

He was rapidly put right...there were no riots by the people of Toxteth this summer.

Such casual and intentionally selective ‘reporting’ is designed to infuriate the people of Liverpool and confirm the idea of the Tories as the ‘Nasty Party’ to everyone else.

The Labour and Liberal politicians thanked God for the BBC narrative and joined in, quite happy to lie about this story for their own political benefit and of course trying to make comparisons with today‘s situation....

Just two examples from many of the opportunistic bottom feeding politicians who slither out to spread their odious lies and all given credibility by the BBC .....

Former Liverpool Labour MP Peter Kilfoyle commented to the Echo: “I think the papers show an honest reflection of Tory thinking....I frankly do not think they cared. ”

Labour MP Louise Ellman said 'Lord Howe typifies a Tory attitude that is deeply unpleasant.'

It is highly provocative and politically damaging nationally for the BBC to feed these lies and give them any credibility at all. The BBC is supposedly the gold standard upon which the people can rely on for accurate and unbiased reporting of events.

The attitude of the BBC types can be neatly summarised in this story about ‘A Gay Girl in Damascus’....The true author of A Gay Girl in Damascus is Tom MacMaster, a 40-year-old American Middle East activist studying at Edinburgh University .

‘That serious journalists fell for MacMaster’s fiction speaks to a profound crisis of objectivity in the modern media, and a preference for simplistic moralism over the tough task of reporting.

The trend for transforming other people’s struggles into self-serving morality plays has led to an alarmingly casual attitude towards the distinction between truth and lies.

MacMaster justifies his fake blog by saying that he was ‘trying to enlighten people’. The Guardian says his blog might have been a hoax but it nonetheless ‘[drew] attention to a nation’s woes’ ‘

‘Okay, we might have toyed with the facts, but we got at some deeper truth.’

Wasn’t that Lenin’s justification for killing anyone opposed to Communist policies......the future is all that matters...sacrifices now will bring us a better future?

The end justifies the means.

What the public gets is a shallow, prejudiced and highly inaccurate view of the world ...such distortion leads to a political system out of kilter and, as intended by the BBC, essentially a one party state as all opponents to the BBC world view are shouted down or denied a voice...and one party politics is not a state of affairs conducive to a free and liberal culture...ironically.

We all remember Paxman in 2007 saying ..."you rely upon second-hand information-quotes from powerful vested interests, assessments from organisations which do the work we don’t have time for, even, god help us, press releases from public relations agencies. The consequence is that what follows isn’t analysis. It’s simply comment, because analysis takes time, and comment is free."

but not free of consequences....consequences that lead to an entirely new world, one that is inherently dangerous and without safeguards developed over centuries to ensure our freedoms, safety and fair government.

All that is at risk because of distorted, misleading reporting flooding out from the world's most trusted source of information...the BBC

source

Steve

PARLIAMENT IS THE ENEMY OF THE ENGLISC NATION

The English, insofar as they recognise their origin, identity and cultural roots, are not 'Westerners', but an ancient northern people - Rev. John Lovejoy

hige sceal þe heardra, heorte þe cenre mod sceal þe mare, þe ure mægen lytlað


#2 scouserbob

scouserbob

    Thegn

  • +Devoted Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 329 posts
  • Ethnicity:English, native of Liverpool
  • Location:Willanhalh, Suð Staffordscir, Englaland
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 January 2012 - 01:21 PM

By all accounts the loony left Labour Party in Liverpool mismanaged the city and caused more damage than Thatcher's Tories. I was born in 1985 so I remember next to nothing of Thatcher's government, but it seems the unions caused as much damage as any government to industry in this country.

This whole story of the Tory "plan to abandon Liverpool" smacks of hype and misinformation, and it seems obvious this suggestion was just that - one possible solution to a chronic problem. But look around Liverpool now and know there was no such plan put into action and no "managed decline"; Liverpool is no worse than any large English city. This is just mischief making by the CBC.
Give England back to the English, sing it if you dare...

In defeat, malice; in victory, revenge

En lied ús net yn fersiking

#3 Mercian

Mercian

    Huscarl

  • English Shieldwall
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,123 posts
  • Ethnicity:English
  • Location:London
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 January 2012 - 11:20 PM

The hard core left wing have a lot to answer for as regards the shambles that Liverpool was in in the 80s.They deliberately and illegally overspent to the amount of £30M.